Tuesday, October 14, 2008

THE DEBATE

We chose the name bloblings to force the debate down to the entity that is the most difficult to defend. It’s the phase of life that has been the most mysterious and least known. We believe we can defend the fact that the blobling in the womb is a person with all rights. And we challenge the abortion industry to prove that they do not lend support to the destruction of innocent human life. The burden of proof falls on those of us who condone and defend abortion! Therefore, until such proof can be demonstrated, it’s our moral duty to protect the lives of even the earliest preborn persons, the bloblings!

So, we ask: Why have we, the citizens of America, allowed ourselves to be persuaded that we have the right to kill a preborn human life even though we have not, and cannot, demonstrate—scientifically, philosophically or medically—beyond a reasonable doubt, that the preborn life is not a fully human person?

Along with seemingly irrefutable logic, we agree with the legal scholars who find Roe v. Wade and its companion decision, Doe v. Bolton to be unwarranted judicial activism that has turned the Constitution on its head. It has not only given us abortion on demand, but even abortion at birth, which has created a pervasive disrespect for human life, and has caused us to endure the shameful era of dump bin babies—the treating of human life as trash! What a reflection on American morality, and what depraved, inhumane injustice we have visited on the most innocent member of our human family.

No comments: